Abstract
This study elucidates the structural mechanisms that enable sustained individual excellence using the theoretical framework of Thought Engineering. Specifically, we analyze three subjects—Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), Warren Buffett (1930-), and Jack Bogle (1929-2019)—through the unified concept of "Self-Operating System Engineering" (Self-OS Engineering).
The research reveals that exceptional individuals commonly possess the following structural characteristics: (1) systematic codification of personal values, (2) habituation mechanisms for daily practice, (3) update protocols responsive to environmental changes, and (4) systematic judgment criteria that avoid emotional fluctuations. This study demonstrates that the construction of integrated "Self-OS" comprising these elements constitutes the fundamental factor for long-term excellence.
I. Introduction
1.1 Research Background and Problem Setting
Conventional research on individual excellence has developed from three perspectives: talent theory, effort theory, and environment theory. However, these approaches fail to explain a critical phenomenon: why do only certain individuals achieve sustained results over decades despite equivalent talent and effort investment?
This study presents a novel theoretical framework called "Self-OS Engineering" to address this question. Self-OS Engineering refers to the process by which individuals structure their cognitive, judgment, and behavioral processes to construct internal systems independent of external environmental fluctuations.
The process by which individuals codify their values, judgment criteria, and behavioral patterns, incorporating them into habitual practice to construct internal systems robust against environmental volatility.
1.2 The Necessity of Thought Engineering Approach
Conventional psychological and management research has analyzed individual success factors across three layers: emotion, cognition, and behavior. However, the existence of superordinate structures integrating these elements remains insufficiently examined.
Thought Engineering is an academic discipline that analyzes the design principles and operational mechanisms of individual cognitive systems from an engineering perspective, conceptualizing them as "philosophical operating systems." This study employs this Thought Engineering approach to illuminate the structural foundations of excellence previously difficult to grasp through conventional research.
II. Theoretical Framework
2.1 Human Systems Theory in Thought Engineering
Thought Engineering understands humans as systems with the following hierarchical structure:
Layer | Function | Characteristics | Update Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
L4: Values OS | Fundamental value judgment | Life philosophy, sense of mission | Years to decades |
L3: Decision OS | Daily decision-making | Rules, principles | Months to years |
L2: Habit OS | Behavioral patterns | Routines, rituals | Weeks to months |
L1: Execution OS | Concrete actions | Tasks, operations | Daily basis |
2.2 Fundamental Theorem of Self-OS Engineering
The necessary and sufficient condition for individual P to achieve sustained excellence in time interval [t₁, t₂] is the construction of Self-OS satisfying the following four elements:
Where:
- E(P): Excellence index of individual P
- V: Degree of value codification
- R: Clarity of rules
- H: Degree of habit establishment
- U: Effectiveness of update mechanisms
2.3 Integration Theory of Tedium and Play
Conventionally, "Tedium" and "Play" have been understood as opposing concepts. However, Thought Engineering analysis reveals both as different implementation methods of Self-OS Engineering.
Self-OS design prioritizing system stability and predictability, emphasizing robustness against environmental fluctuations.
【Definition 3】Play-type Self-OS
Self-OS design emphasizing system flexibility and adaptability, utilizing environmental fluctuations as learning opportunities.
III. Research Methodology
3.1 Subject Selection Criteria
This study analyzed three individuals meeting the following criteria:
- Sustained activity period exceeding 50 years
- Established objective superiority in their field
- Existence of records regarding self-systems
- Representativeness across different fields and eras
3.2 Data Sources
The analysis utilized the following primary sources:
- Franklin: Autobiography, Records of "13 Virtues" practice
- Buffett: Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting minutes, Investment principles statements
- Bogle: The Little Book of Common Sense Investing, Vanguard founding documents
IV. Case Analysis
4.1 Benjamin Franklin: The Prototype of Self-OS Engineering
4.1.1 Construction of Values OS
Franklin established his "13 Virtues" at age 22 and practiced them throughout his life. This represents humanity's first systematic Self-OS Engineering experiment.
"I wished to live without committing any fault at any time; I would conquer all that either natural inclination, custom, or company might lead me into. As I knew, or thought I knew, what was right and wrong, I did not see why I might not always do the one and avoid the other."
4.1.2 Implementation Mechanisms
Franklin's Self-OS possessed the following structural characteristics:
- Codification: Documentation of 13 virtues
- Measurability: Daily checklist method
- Phased implementation: Weekly focus virtue rotation
- Long-term continuity: 84 years of sustained practice
4.2 Warren Buffett: Exemplar of Play-type Self-OS
4.2.1 Systematization of Investment Philosophy
Buffett's investment principles, while appearing playful, actually function as an extremely rigorous Self-OS.
Principle | Content | OS Function |
---|---|---|
Comprehensibility | Never invest in incomprehensible businesses | Clarification of judgment criteria |
Long-term holding | Invest with intention of permanent ownership | Avoidance of emotional fluctuations |
Management evaluation | Emphasis on excellent management teams | Structuring qualitative assessment |
Price discipline | Purchase only below fair value | Introduction of mechanical judgment |
4.2.2 Integration of Playfulness and Rigor
Buffett's distinctive feature lies in perceiving investment as a "joyful game" while constructing rigorous rule-based systems behind this perspective. This exemplifies the typical Play-type Self-OS.
4.3 Jack Bogle: Exemplar of Tedium-type Self-OS
4.3.1 Philosophical Foundation of "Aesthetics of Tedium"
Bogle deliberately chose "tedium" and made it the core of his investment philosophy. This choice functioned as Self-OS design that eliminated emotional fluctuations and ensured mechanical continuity.
4.3.2 Ensuring Robustness through System Simplification
Bogle's Self-OS was based on the following design philosophy:
- Extreme simplification: Investment only in the entire market
- Emotion elimination: Only mechanical rebalancing
- Cost minimization: Thorough fee reduction
- Long-term fixation: Complete prohibition of strategy changes
V. Comparative Analysis and Theoretical Considerations
5.1 Common Structural Characteristics of the Three Subjects
Analysis of Franklin, Buffett, and Bogle confirmed the following common structure:
【Proof of Structural Isomorphism】
Despite surface differences, the three subjects' Self-OS possess the following isomorphic structure:
Element | Franklin | Buffett | Bogle |
---|---|---|---|
Principles | 13 Virtues | Investment Philosophy | Index Ideology |
Rules | Daily Checks | Investment Criteria | Mechanical Operations |
Habits | Weekly Rotation | Long-term Holding | Regular Rebalancing |
Updates | Annual Review | Principle Refinement | Cost Improvement |
5.2 Integration Mechanism of Tedium and Play
Previously understood as oppositional, "tedium" and "play" prove to have complementary relationships within the context of Self-OS Engineering.
Effective Self-OS integrates system-level tedium (stability) with content-level play (flexibility).
5.3 Emergence Mechanism of Sustained Excellence
Analysis reveals that sustained excellence emerges through the following mechanisms:
- Structural avoidance of emotional fluctuations: Prevention of emotional judgment errors through systematized decisions
- Realization of compound effects: Exponential growth through accumulation of consistent actions
- Adaptability to environmental changes: Hierarchical stability with fixed principles and flexible tactics
- Acquisition of social trust: Long-term relationship building through predictable behavior
VI. Implementation Theory
6.1 Basic Principles of Self-OS Design
Based on this study's analytical results, the fundamental principles of effective Self-OS design are presented below:
Values, judgment criteria, and behavioral rules must be clearly documented.
【Design Principle 2】Principle of Measurability
System operational status must be quantitatively measurable.
【Design Principle 3】Principle of Phased Implementation
Systems must not be completed at once but constructed and improved gradually.
【Design Principle 4】Principle of Update Mechanisms
Update protocols responsive to environmental changes must be incorporated.
6.2 Implementation Process Model
【Four-Phase Implementation Model】
Each phase executes iteratively, realizing system-wide evolution.
VII. Limitations and Future Research Directions
7.1 Study Limitations
This study has the following limitations:
- Sample size: Limitations of theory construction based on three case analyses
- Temporal specificity: Analysis limited to 18th-21st century Western cultural sphere
- Field specificity: Constraints on generalizability due to investment and political field characteristics
- Causal relationships: Insufficient rigorous proof of causality between Self-OS Engineering and excellence
7.2 Future Research Directions
- Large-scale empirical studies: Statistical verification through more numerous cases
- Cross-cultural research: Analysis of Self-OS Engineering in Eastern thought and culture
- Neuroscientific foundations: Elucidation of brain science mechanisms
- AI-assisted systems: Development of artificial intelligence-supported Self-OS construction systems
- Collective OS theory: Extension of Self-OS Engineering theory to organizational and societal levels
VIII. Conclusion
8.1 Summary of Research Outcomes
This study elucidated mechanisms of individual sustained excellence using Thought Engineering approaches. Major achievements include:
- Establishment of Self-OS Engineering theory: Presentation of theoretical framework explaining individual excellence unifiedly as "Self-OS" construction
- Tedium-Play integration theory: Integrated understanding of previously oppositional concepts
- Implementation process model: Development of concrete methodology for applying theory to practice
- Universal design principles: Extraction of Self-OS design principles applicable across fields and eras
8.2 Thought Engineering Significance
This study contributed the following to the emerging academic field of Thought Engineering:
- Establishment of theoretical foundations for individual systems theory
- Demonstration of analytical methods integrating spirituality and logic
- Presentation of fusion models combining Eastern wisdom and Western methodology
8.3 Social Implications
"Individuals systematizing themselves to achieve sustained excellence"—this demonstrated possibility can provide revolutionary impact across education, management, policy-making, and other fields.
Particularly in the AI era, the importance of "the ability to self-OS engineer and continuously evolve" as human value will further increase.
Thought Engineering is expected to develop as an academic discipline providing concrete answers to the essential challenges of human existence in this new era.
References
Primary Sources
- Franklin, B. (1791). The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
- Buffett, W. (1956-2024). Berkshire Hathaway Annual Reports. Omaha: Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
- Bogle, J. C. (2007). The Little Book of Common Sense Investing. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Secondary Sources
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. New York: Scribner.
- Clear, J. (2018). Atomic Habits. New York: Avery.
- Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Future Publications
- Ray Kissyou (in preparation). "Foundations of Thought Engineering: Integrating Spirituality and Systems Thinking."
- Kissyou, R. (in preparation). "Spiritual Architecture and Cognitive System Design: An Introduction to Thought Engineering."
Received: December XX, 2024
Author Contact: ray@thought-engineering.org
Conflict of Interest: No conflicts of interest to disclose regarding this research.
